<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Another Idea &#187; olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anotheridea.org/tag/olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anotheridea.org</link>
	<description>Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.     - Barry Goldwater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Blame Obama for Olympic Loss?</title>
		<link>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/can-you-blame-obama-for-olympic-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/can-you-blame-obama-for-olympic-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rory cooper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotheridea.org/?p=3318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So can you blame President Obama for not bringing home the gold? The answer is no, but his arrogance was certainly on full display. <a href="http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/can-you-blame-obama-for-olympic-loss/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="by Rory Cooper" src="http://anotheridea.org/images/headshots/cooper_rory.jpg" alt="by Rory Cooper" width="100" height="150" /></p>
<p>After today’s announcement by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) that Rio de Janeiro, Brazil would be the host of the 2016 Olympics, supporters and opponents of the President immediately began debating his impact on the decision. This was a debate that had been simmering for a week, due in no small part to the revelation that the President had spent considerably less time than one would expect with his U.S. Commander in Afghanistan. His presence in Copenhagen was also not assisted by another devastating round of unemployment numbers announced this morning, bringing U.S. unemployment to the brink of 10%.</p>
<p>So can you blame President Obama for not bringing home the gold? The answer is no, but his arrogance was certainly on full display. Any U.S. President would have been expected to proudly make the sales pitch for Chicago, and America as a whole, but the way President Obama went about it was very indicative of the way he leads on more pressing domestic and international issues.<span id="more-3318"></span></p>
<p>In 2008, when the President was elected, it was viewed as a net positive to America’s chances in this competition. In fact, <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=3683722" target="_blank">ESPN noted</a> that a win by Senator McCain may have made the situation worse, due to his “scathing investigation of the bribery scandal involving IOC members who helped award the 2002 Winter Olympics to Salt Lake City.” Certainly, IOC members may not have appreciated more scrutiny nor rewarded his oversight in the past.  But the Obama team worked hard on their bid, with senior White House advisor Valerie Jarrett, a former Chicago 2016 Board Member who was replaced by the Obama campaign Treasurer, leading the charge, with a specially designed White House office.</p>
<p>And the first people to tell you about the hard work it took the White House would be the President and Mrs. Obama themselves.  The First Lady told boosters this week: “<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/" target="_blank">As much of a sacrifice</a> as people say this is for me or Oprah or the president to come for these few days, so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home.” Has anyone commented on their tremendous sacrifice? They flew several private jumbo jets (carbon footprint?) to beautiful Copenhagen for three days. This is not the sacrifice Americans are familiar with.</p>
<p>Frankly, it was the job of all of these well connected Chicago 2016 White House insiders to let their colleagues know whether a multi-million dollar trip to Copenhagen was worth it. If the United States was running neck and neck with Brazil, there is little doubt the President should have been there. If they were running a close third, then the trip is still probably in the nation’s best interests. But fourth place? The Olympics themselves don’t honor fourth place. Either the White House knew where they stood and arrogantly thought the President could change minds, or they didn’t know, meaning the White House had little or no ability to use dozens of high-profile insiders to gage the temperature of less than 100 IOC voters. Both scenarios are hard to believe.</p>
<p>If the speech was considered the tipping point, how did it go? Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, gave <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&amp;sid=aYj3H9Au.r24" target="_blank">an impassioned speech</a> saying: “It’s time to address this imbalance. The Olympic Games belongs to all people, all continents, all humanity,” referring to the fact that the Olympics had never been held in South America. It wasn’t about Lula, rather it was about an entire culture that felt it could proudly lead these games.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/10/michelle_obamas_pitch_to_the_i.html" target="_blank">Michelle Obama spoke about</a> her time growing up in Chicago, and passionately spoke of her father’s influence on her love for sports. She said “I” or “me” 26 times in an address that lasted only a few minutes. She closed by saying: “…and to give us hope; and to change lives all over the world. And I’ve brought somebody with me today who knows a little something about change,” and then introduced her husband. Hope. Change. This wasn’t about America, or our culture, this was about the Obamas.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/sports/olympics/03obama-text.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=2" target="_blank">President Obama</a> arrived at the lectern and also included 26 “I’s” or “Me’s” in his speech.  Towards the end of the speech, he even had to remind the audience that it wasn’t about him, the individual, after describing the throngs of people who turned out to watch him win the election in November.  He talked about why he ran for President.  He talked about meeting the First Lady in Chicago.</p>
<p>See, what the President and the First Lady missed is that the Olympics aren’t about change. They’ve had the same running distances, the same sized shot put, the same discus for centuries. Some things don’t need to be changed. Did their inclusion of their familiar campaign rhetoric end our bid? Probably not. The reality is that the choice of who would host the Olympics was most likely not made in the past two days alone. Just as in a presidential election, voters most likely had their preferences before arriving in Copenhagen to vote.</p>
<p>The problem is that the Obamas thought it was about them, until they lost and then it was about something else. Either the White House knew they were coming in fourth and the President thought that much of his oratory skills, or the due diligence of their closest advisors was paltry at best. Either way, let’s hope they don’t keep repeating this scenario on other important issues.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_O'Brien" target="_blank">Dan O’Brien</a> was an American decathlete who in 1992, was poised for Olympic Gold. He was so hyped up that he got arrogant.  He passed up lower pole vault settings because he thought he could reach the sky on every try.  He lost.  He was still a world record holder, but now he was also a champion in humility.  America loves champions of humility.  Congratulations Rio! You earned this.</p>
<hr /><img class="aligncenter" title="aibanner" src="http://anotheridea.org/ai_banner.png" alt="" /></p>
<hr /><a href="http://www.heritage.org/" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1748" title="Heritage Foundation" src="http://anotheridea.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/logo_heritage.png" alt="Heritage Foundation" width="300" height="50" /></a></p>
<p>[avhamazon wishlist="3QHI8AV13943V" asin="1596981091" linktype="pic" locale="US" picsize="large"]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/can-you-blame-obama-for-olympic-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Obama gets 2016 Games, Daley will be king, not mayor</title>
		<link>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/3289/</link>
		<comments>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/3289/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Tribune</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotheridea.org/?p=3289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president of the United States shouldn't have to fly halfway around the world to humble himself before a posse of international sports influence peddlers and beg for a track meet. <a href="http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/3289/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-johnkass,0,5724822.columnist" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" title="by John Kass" src="http://anotheridea.org/images/headshots/kass_john.jpg" alt="by John Kass" /></a>The president of the United States shouldn&#8217;t have to fly halfway around the world to humble himself before a posse of international sports influence peddlers and beg for a track meet.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s exactly what he is doing.<span id="more-3289"></span></p>
<p>By going to Denmark with all the other City Hall politicos, including those from the White House, President Barack Obama is doing more than asking the International Olympic Committee to allow Chicago to host the 2016 Games.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s asking the IOC to make Mayor Richard Daley the king of Chicago for life.</p>
<p>If Chicago gets the games, it will be Obama who will get the credit, for making sure that Daley, with all that Olympic gold to spend, will remain the undisputed political boss forevermore.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s reform the Obama Way.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want to get into a political game,&#8221; Chicago 2016 Chairman Patrick Ryan told reporters in Copenhagen, as contingents from Chicago, Rio, Madrid and Tokyo politicked for the right to host the Olympic festival. &#8220;This race is about sports and competition. This should not be about a competition between heads of state. It&#8217;s all about the athletes and Paralympians.</p>
<p>&#8220;President Obama is coming here out of respect for the athletes and the bid,&#8221; Ryan said.</p>
<p>Oh, really?</p>
<p>Ryan may be many things, but dumb isn&#8217;t one of them. He&#8217;s a realist, worth a gazillion dollars. His former archrival, Near North Insurance boss Mickey Segal, is a broken man, sitting in federal prison, probably going stir-crazy. Someday, Ryan will end up owning the Chicago Bears. Yet he talks in terms of sport and competition.</p>
<p>If you think Chicago&#8217;s Olympic push is about sports, you&#8217;re mistaken. Sports has nothing to do with this. It&#8217;s like in the old movie, with Michael Corleone telling truths to his future wife, saying, &#8220;Now who&#8217;s being naive, Kay?&#8221;</p>
<p>Whether you want the games or not, please try muffling out those giddy broadcast news types and their frenetic cheerleading and understand what you&#8217;re really watching.</p>
<p>If Chicago gets the games, the contracts and the grease and immense leverage to reshape a city will be used as originally intended. To rebuild the boss, to give a mayor facing deficits and taxpayer revolts and headaches a much-needed shoring up of his political infrastructure.</p>
<p>Surely the Obama White House, run by former Daleyites, knows that a Chicago Olympics will keep the mayor politically secure. That crown was once heavy and uncertain upon Daley&#8217;s head, when the feds were raiding City Hall and sending his underlings to prison. Only a few years ago, the mayor ridiculed the Olympic idea. These days, he carries the torch in his teeth.</p>
<p>It must be all about reform. When Obama was campaigning for president, there was that thrilling line about how he would &#8220;transcend the politics of the past&#8221; &#8212; a line probably written by Daley&#8217;s mouthpiece David Axelrod. It sent tingles up or down the legs of the fawning punditry, particularly among liberal commentators silently beseeching Obama to exorcise their racial guilt.</p>
<p>But it also had the effect of portraying Obama as some kind of dreamer.</p>
<p>Yet our president is no dreamer. His guys might sell Hopium, but he doesn&#8217;t smoke or eat the stuff. He knew he had to go to Copenhagen. The mayor of Chicago and Oprah Winfrey expected him to be there.</p>
<p>If he didn&#8217;t show, and Chicago didn&#8217;t get the Olympics, Obama would be blamed. If he goes, and Chicago doesn&#8217;t win, well, at least he tried. And if Chicago wins, he&#8217;s the president who closed the deal.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve got so much to do here,&#8221; Obama told NATO Secretary-General Anders Rasmussen in the Oval Office on Tuesday. &#8220;So, I will sleep on the plane. I&#8217;ll land. I&#8217;ll speak. Then fly right back.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he is going.</p>
<p>At least his journey invited an entertaining squabble between some Republicans and the president&#8217;s men.</p>
<p>Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said that while it was noble for Obama to pitch the games for his home city, the trip distracted from truly pressing issues.</p>
<p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s he rooting for?&#8221; snarked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs in response to Steele. &#8220;Is he hoping to hop a plane to Brazil and catch the Olympics in Rio? I don&#8217;t know. Maybe it&#8217;s Madrid.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a good argument to be made on Obama&#8217;s behalf for this Olympic push. He&#8217;s the president from Chicago, where he was given his political birth. Obama knows what this is about.</p>
<p>It is about paying political debts. It is about waltzing with the one that brought him to the dance, not so much Michelle, as dancing with the little guy with the short shanks on the 5th floor of City Hall.</p>
<p>So he will fly halfway around the world when he doesn&#8217;t have the time, with so many other items on his agenda, because he has to.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s Chicago&#8217;s president. And he got the call from the boss.</p>
<hr /><img class="aligncenter" title="aibanner" src="http://anotheridea.org/ai_banner.png" alt="" /></p>
<hr /><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" title="Chicago Tribune" src="http://anotheridea.org/images/logos/logo_ChicagoTribune.JPG" alt="" width="266" height="64" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anotheridea.org/2009/10/3289/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

