Tag Archives: terrorism
How War Fighting Became Law Enforcement
Two months after the 1998 bombers of the U.S. embassy in Kenya were convicted, al-Qaeda destroyed the Twin Towers, struck the Pentagon, and was foiled by the martyred patriots of Flight 93 in an attempt to attack the Capitol or the White House. Unlike its predecessor, the Bush administration deemed the attack an act of war, as did Congress, which overwhelmingly authorized the use of military force a week later. American officials were dispatched to foreign lands to conduct military and intelligence operations, not criminal investigations. Prosecution, which in the eight previous years had managed to neutralize fewer than three dozen jihadists, most of them low-level, was aptly judged to have been a provocatively weak response to a transnational terrorist network with global aims and frightful capabilities. Continue reading
It's Beginning Again
Israelis have been involved in this process long enough to know that each “new beginning” is worse than its predecessor. Continue reading
Is Dr. Tiller’s Killer a Terrorist?
Mostly, it appears, the Tiller/terrorist question is emotional energy-drink for both sides of the abortion debate. Continue reading
D-Day for the Dems
Unless the left figures out how to make peace with the notion of legitimate self-defense, Dems (and let’s hope not the rest of the country) may be in for a rude awakening. Continue reading
The Torture Debate, Continued
This month, I wrote a column outlining two exceptions to the no-torture rule: the ticking time bomb scenario and its less extreme variant in which a high-value terrorist refuses to divulge crucial information that could save innocent lives. The column elicited protest and opposition that were, shall we say, spirited…And occasionally stupid. Continue reading
Inhuman Rights
The HRC has no legal authority. It passes nonbinding resolutions on what it decides are human rights abuses and can only make recommendations to the General Assembly. Nevertheless, its resolutions enjoy the UN imprimatur, and it can legitimize barbarities simply by ignoring them. If a dictator can claim in the international media that the HRC has passed no resolutions against him, his job of maintaining the status quo and lobbying against intervention in his country’s affairs becomes that much easier. Continue reading


